stackabletech / stackabletech/hdfs-operator
Improve data locality by considering Kubernetes topology
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Rust
- Stars
- 53
- Forks
- 9
- Avg merge
- 1d 13h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 10
Description
Description
As users of the HDFS operator and a Stackable deployed HDFS we want it to ensure data locality by talking to a DataNode on the same Kubernetes node as the client first if one exists.
Value
HDFS tries to store the first copy of a block on a "local" machine before shipping data to remote machines over the network. This relies on a simple IP address comparison in the HDFS code which breaks due to the nature of Kubernetes where pods don't share the same IP even if they are on the same Kubernetes node.
I believe we can improve this situation by changing the HDFS code to consider the Kubernetes node while looking for a "local" machine.
We already have precedent with the hdfs-topology-provider which does something similar. I believe we can plug this logic into the chooseLocalOrFavoredStorage method of BlockPlacementPolicyDefault.
We want this because it will probably benefit all workloads that are using HDFS and locally attached storage and that are using things like Spark or HBase where processing can happen on the same Kubernetes node as the storage. The benefit is going to be less network traffic and a boost in performance.
Dependencies
It probably makes sense to reuse code from the hdfs-topology-provider project.
Tasks
- Understand exactly what the topology provider is doing: We need a way - from within Kubernetes - to get the node a client is "calling" from (via its IP) as well as the node the DataNodes are running on
- Decide whether this behavior is going to be enabled by default or not
- Discuss the best point where to plug this behavior in and create a patch or pluggable class (etc. a BlockPlacementPolicy)
- Document the behavior
- Test it on a multi-node cluster and also test it with external clients (listener etc.)
- Marketing: Discuss with marketing whether we should create a blog post about it
Acceptance Criteria
- We have a way to compare data locality based on Kubernetes nodes that falls back to the default in case there is an error
- The behavior is documented even if it is not changeable/pluggable
Release Notes
The HDFS NameNodes will now look at the Kubernetes topology when considering whether a client request is made locally or not. This means it will consider all clients "local" that are hosted on the same Kubernetes node as a DataNode.
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start by understanding the hdfs-topology-provider behavior and the BlockPlacementPolicyDefault.chooseLocalOrFavoredStorage method named in the issue. Determine how client and DataNode Kubernetes nodes are compared, including external clients and error fallback, then test on a multi-node cluster. Done means locality works with default fallback and the behavior is documented.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- kubernetes
- Domain
- distributed-systems, infrastructure
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Newbie friendliness
- 25/100