stac-utils / stac-utils/rustac
Experiment with flattening assets
Open
Nobody has claimed this yet.
[crate] core
- Dominant language
- Rust
- Stars
- 145
- Forks
- 24
- Avg merge
- 1d 10h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 12
Description
I'm not sure if it's worth the trouble, but let's experiment with flattening assets to the top level when we write stac-geoparquet. There may be some performance benefits?
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start by locating the stac-geoparquet writing path and determine how assets are currently represented. Define whether flattening assets to the top level is compatible with the format, then validate the experiment with representative output and performance measurements.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- rust
- Domain
- data
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 25/100