stac-utils / stac-utils/rustac
Flexible stac-geoparquet schema
Open
Nobody has claimed this yet.
[crate] core
- Dominant language
- Rust
- Stars
- 145
- Forks
- 24
- Avg merge
- 1d 10h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 12
Description
Can we put additional fields in a mapping?
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
The issue only asks whether additional fields can be placed in a mapping and names no files or tests. Start by locating the STAC GeoParquet schema and mapping entry points, then determine the intended representation and compatibility requirements. Done should include a documented schema decision and tests covering additional fields.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- rust
- Domain
- data
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 25/100