[Feature]: Integrate a real/stealth browser (like ego-browser) to reduce automation fingerprinting

### Problem or use case

Today the product wraps a browser shell, so automation is easy to detect via risk-control / anti-bot systems. Many automation fingerprints and detectable automation signals are not hidden or mitigated.

**Ask:** Can we integrate a more “real” browser stack (similar to ego-browser) so automated sessions look and behave closer to a genuine user browser?

### Proposed solution

- Integrate a real/stealth browser approach (comparable to ego-browser) rather than only a thin automation shell.
- Make browser automation closer to human operation (timing, input, environment, anti-detect surface) to reduce risk-control / bot-detection flags.
- Reduce or mask common automation detection points that currently leak “this is automated.”

### Alternatives or additional context

_No response_

---

### Original (untranslated)

**Title:** [Feature]: 浏览器能否集成真实的浏览器进去 类似 ego-browser一样。

**Body:**

### Problem or use case

[Feature]: 浏览器能否集成真实的浏览器进去 类似 ego-browser一样。现在套了一个壳，自动化太容易风控了 很多自动化的点都没有屏蔽

### Proposed solution

让浏览器自动化 像人操作一样，降低自动化操作风险

### Alternatives or additional context

_No response_