square / square/workflow-kotlin
Support explicit expectation of no worker running
Open
@0legg is already working on this.
Since Jan 31, 2022.
enhancement
good first issue
testing
- Dominant language
- Kotlin
- Stars
- 1.1k
- Forks
- 112
- Avg merge
- 10h 5m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 3
Description
Right now there is no easy way to expect that some particular worker is not running during the given render step. There is a workaround to use requireExplicitWorkerExpectations, but it requires to specify the footprint for the rest of the workers.
Proposal: add methods like expectNoWorker/expectNoWorkerOutputting that will do the work complementary to expectWorker/expectWorkerOutputting by checking non-existence of a single worker with specific footprint.
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Assessment
This issue has not been assessed yet.