Where should Rules/Collectors and Ownership Plugins Live?
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Kotlin
- Stars
- 129
- Forks
- 4
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
Detekt has a "Marketplace" where you can contribute rulesets https://detekt.dev/marketplace/
This is somewhat similar to how I envision Collectors to work, but it's a separate body of work to maintain a set of publicly used "plugins" of sort.
I've removed the current proof of concept collectors from the codebase recently as I didn't want to create a larger surface area of maintainence. I'm still figuring out what it looks like internally, and I don't want to publish things people might start relying on quite yet.
My thought is that I'll give it a few months and see if any naturally bubble up as "General Purpose", and contribute those back as "official" ones, and then also have a sort of marketplace like Detekt has as well.
Creating the issue for discussion and to share thoughts.
Example: Github CODEOWNERS Ownership code exists, but it was ported from another repo and we don't plan on maintaining. https://github.com/square/invert/tree/a11079916c924a640bc16d11196772ac5472ab63/owners/owners-github-codeowners
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Review the removed collectors proof of concept at commit a11079916c924a640bc16d11196772ac5472ab63 and the owners/owners-github-codeowners example, then compare Detekt's Marketplace model. Done means agreeing on and documenting where collectors and ownership plugins live, including their maintenance and publication model.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- kotlin
- Domain
- tooling
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 20/100