Handling of meta data is inconsistent between different embedding models.

OpenAiEmbeddingModel uses the following code for creating an embedding for a document:

@Override
public float[] embed(Document document) {
	Assert.notNull(document, "Document must not be null");
	return this.embed(document.getFormattedContent(this.metadataMode));
}

metadataModel controls if all, some or none of the metadata is included in constructing the String that then is used to create an embedding.
The default MetadataMode is EMBED which includes all fields, that aren't explicitly excluded.

OllamaEmbeddingModel on the other hand uses this implementation:

@Override
public float[] embed(Document document) {
	return embed(document.getText());
}

This means metadata is not included at all.

I don't see a reason why this behaviour is different for different embedding models. It should be the same for all and only implemented once, possibly in AbstractEmbeddingModel

Compare the Document overloads in OpenAiEmbeddingModel and OllamaEmbeddingModel, then inspect the possible shared implementation in AbstractEmbeddingModel and the MetadataMode default described in the issue. Done means document embedding handles metadata consistently across the affected models, with coverage confirming the behavior.