improve validation of risk_message fields
Open
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Python
- Stars
- 139
- Forks
- 52
- Avg merge
- 1h 16m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 3
Description
One of the errors that is seen during integration testing is the tokenized field $field$ is not present in the search output. Lets add check this in validate so that we can catch this earlier before integration testing.
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start by locating the validate logic for risk_message fields in contentctl and trace how the search output is checked. Done means validation reports when a tokenized field such as $field$ is absent, before integration testing reaches this error.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- python
- Domain
- tooling
- Issue type
- Bug
- Difficulty
- 2/5
- Estimated time
- 1-3 hours
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Newbie friendliness
- 35/100