spinframework / spinframework/spin
Consider switching service chaining domain from `spin.internal` to `spin.alt`
Open
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Rust
- Stars
- 6.5k
- Forks
- 310
- Avg merge
- 1d 20h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 24
Description
Looking at https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9476.html I think .alt might be more appropriate:
.alt"should not be resolved using the DNS protocol".internalis to be used for internal networks with DNS
(RFC9476 is only a proposal but very far along and seems almost certain to be accepted)
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
The issue names no files or tests; first search the repository for spin.internal and inspect the service-chaining entry points, then read RFC 9476. Done means the domain choice is agreed and all affected service-chaining behavior and references consistently use the selected domain, with relevant tests updated.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Domain
- networking
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Newbie friendliness
- 25/100