Advisement: should generate a P or DIV, not a STRONG
Nobody has claimed this yet.
Assessment
- Difficulty
- 3/5
- Estimated time
- 1-2 days
- Newbie friendliness
- 35/100
- Issue type
- Feature
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Activity status
- Stale
- Tech stack
- css, html
- Domain
- documentation
Research direction
Locate the utility class for strong.advisement and the code that generates advisements, then compare their output with Notes. Determine how advisements should produce P or DIV elements instead of STRONG while preserving the stated block and centered presentation. Done means generated advisements use the intended element consistently.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Description
There's a utility class for strong.advisement that makes them display: block and centered, but most advisements are probably wanting to be Ps or DIVs, just like Notes.
- Dominant language
- HTML
- Stars
- 1.3k
- Forks
- 220
- Avg merge
- 6d 37m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 1
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
More from speced/bikeshed
-
Difficulty 1/5 Under an hour Newbie friendliness 68/100
-
Difficulty 4/5 3-5 days Newbie friendliness 68/100
-
Difficulty 3/5 1-2 days Newbie friendliness 55/100
-
Difficulty 5/5 Over a week Newbie friendliness 45/100
-
Difficulty 3/5 1-2 days Newbie friendliness 55/100
Similar issues
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 78/100
bancolombia/sentinel#22 ·
-
test md OpenCI
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 74/100
-
optimization optimization:agents-md-curator
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 86/100
githubnext/gh-aw-cao#13143 ·
-
Difficulty 1/5 Under an hour Newbie friendliness 94/100
objectionary/hone-maven-plugin#1061 ·
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 85/100
redhat-developer/rhdh-plugins#4887 · 2 comments ·