Hub rules document is outdated?

Hub rules scope

I think this part is misleading, since some servers have been banned from auth as well after being dehubbed. The most recent example being two EE servers:

Unwritten rule

As I understand it, a server called Arcadis was dehubbed due to harassment that was conducted not by Arcadis' staff, but by other people in the EE fork's discord server where an Arcadis staff members also happened to be present. They were rehubbed a few days later, after leaving said server.

I may be misunderstanding what happened with Arcadis, and if so, I apologize. The dehub anouncement isn't very clear so I'm basing this mostly from a google doc from Arcadis.

From my reading of the hub rules, there doesn't seem to be a rule that this would fall under. If being in the same discord server as harassers, without taking part in any of it, can be grounds for a dehub, I think that the rules should clearly state so.

Start by reviewing the hub rules section shown in the issue, the dehub announcement, and the referenced Arcadis material. Determine whether the rules should cover the described Discord-server association and whether the examples about authentication bans are accurate; done means the policy is resolved and the hub rules document clearly reflects that decision.