List recommended RDF serializations
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- HTML
- Stars
- 563
- Forks
- 108
- Avg merge
- 4d 13h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 3
Description
This issue builds upon the serialization format goals and strategy discussion #454, and aims to determine a list of RDF serializations that are considered "recommended" across all Solid specs, to avoid serialization conflicts across specs (as seen in #463).
The goal of this issue is to discuss whether or not such a list makes sense, and which RDF serializations should be contained in this list.
In contrast to #454, this is the place for discussing preferences on which RDF serializations we want (and don't want) to recommend.
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start by reading the serialization goals and strategy discussion in #454 and the serialization conflict described in #463. Review this issue's discussion to understand the competing preferences; done means reaching agreement on whether a cross-specification recommended list is appropriate and which RDF serializations it contains.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Domain
- documentation
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Newbie friendliness
- 20/100