solid / solid/data-interoperability-panel
Human readable labels for Data Instances, needed when selecting instances on consent screen.
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Bikeshed
- Stars
- 58
- Forks
- 18
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
Something super generic like rdfs:label should work. Authorization Agent showing the consent screen doesn't know about domain-specific vocabs so it needs something generic when showing a label to a user.
Another approach might be that a shape tree specifies the predicate that should be used as a label for data instances.
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start by reading the specification context for the consent screen and how the Authorization Agent selects and displays Data Instances. Compare the generic rdfs:label approach with a shape tree-specified predicate; done requires a decided, documented labeling rule that works without domain-specific vocabularies.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Domain
- authorization
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 25/100