[RFC] feat: Rename d.arrayOf and d.disarrayOf to d.array and d.disarray

The Of prefix is inherited from the equivalent typed-binary APIs, and my choice to do this back then was not to reduce the risk of conflicting with other definitions when imported. We usually use these APIs through the d namespace anyway, and dropping Of would make them mirror the WGSL typed a lot more.

const GRID_WIDTH = 8;
const GRID_HEIGHT = 6;
-const GridSchema = d.arrayOf(d.arrayOf(d.u32, GRID_HEIGHT), GRID_WIDTH);
+const GridSchema = d.array(d.array(d.u32, GRID_HEIGHT), GRID_WIDTH);

What do you guys think?

Breaking change

This would be a breaking change, so it might not be worth it, but we could keep arrayOf and disarrayOf as aliases for a while (a few minors), and recommend the new APIs in all of our docs and examples. We'd deprecate them after this grace period, and delete them shortly after as well.

Start by reviewing the existing d.arrayOf and d.disarrayOf APIs, then locate their documentation and examples. The issue is an RFC rather than an implementation request; done would require a decided migration plan for the proposed names, compatibility aliases, deprecation period, and documentation updates.