Test utility for validating blocks
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- TypeScript
- Stars
- 2.9k
- Forks
- 445
- Avg merge
- 1d 3h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 28
Description
Description
It would be very convenient if this library including a utility for validating blocks. Inside of our tests, we could produce blocks and run them through this utility, which would return true if the block is valid or false otherwise. Currently, blocks are a bit brittle in that changes to block structure can produce errors which can only be debugged interactively through a dummy Slack channel. I don't know what this would involve, but it would be a great feature.
What type of issue is this? (place an x in one of the [ ])
- bug
- enhancement (feature request)
- question
- documentation related
- example code related
- testing related
- discussion
Requirements (place an x in each of the [ ])
- I've read and understood the Contributing guidelines and have done my best effort to follow them.
- I've read and agree to the Code of Conduct.
- I've searched for any related issues and avoided creating a duplicate issue.
What you expected to happen
Actual result:
What actually happened
Attachments:
Logs, screenshots, screencast, sample project, funny gif, etc.
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
The issue names no files, tests, or entry points, so first review the surrounding discussion and locate the library's existing block-related code. Define what makes a produced block valid and how the utility should report failures; done means tests can use it to receive true or false without relying on a dummy Slack channel.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- typescript
- Domain
- testing
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Quiet
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 35/100