six-group / six-group/haproxy-operator

A question about maps

Open
#116 2 comments 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub

Nobody has claimed this yet.

Dominant language
Go
Stars
29
Forks
9
Avg merge
23h 55m
Merged PRs (30d)
16

Description

Acording to the README file, it is possible to use maps but in the example given the map files are assumed to be there.

Now, there are a couple ways to get maps but the most simplest might be just updating the map files (for example, updating a configmap from which a projected volume is created) and then triggering a reload, so I was wondering if there are any plans to add a functionality to handle maps so that any change in them produces a reload. If not, do you know of any solution that we could use?

Contributor guide

No contributing guide indexed for this repository

First steps

  1. Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
  2. Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
  3. Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
  4. Open a pull request that references the issue number.

Research direction

Start with the README example and the operator's handling of map files, ConfigMaps, projected volumes, and reload triggering. Determine whether map changes can be watched and reloaded, and document the supported behavior or the required design and tests.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Assessment

Tech stack
kubernetes
Domain
devops, infrastructure
Issue type
Feature
Difficulty
5/5
Estimated time
Over a week
Activity status
Stale
Clarity
Needs clarification
Newbie friendliness
25/100

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.