Would you be up for a PR that shows help on no options?
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Python
- Stars
- 12.5k
- Forks
- 998
- Avg merge
- 3d 13h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 10
Description
Frequently, I was wondering what was wrong when I just typed llm and it sat at an empty terminal, without any error but without doing anything. IMO it would be preferrable to quit and show the help instead. Would you be up for a PR that shows the help when no argument are specified using no_args_is_help? Or is that not desired, because then llm without any options does not accept standard input anymore?
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
The issue names no file or test; start by locating the CLI entry point and checking how no_args_is_help is configured. Confirm the desired behavior for llm with no arguments, including whether standard input must remain supported, and add coverage for the agreed behavior.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- python
- Domain
- cli
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 2/5
- Estimated time
- 1-3 hours
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Newbie friendliness
- 38/100