siderolabs / siderolabs/docs

Talos 1.14: Example KubeAdmissionControlConfig results in kube-apiserver errors

Open Beginner friendly
#758 1 comment 1 reaction 0 assignees View on GitHub

Nobody has claimed this yet.

Dominant language
MDX
Stars
11
Forks
76
Avg merge
3d 5h
Merged PRs (30d)
26

Description

Path: /talos/v1.14/reference/configuration/kubernetes/kubeadmissioncontrolconfig

Hey team, I got tripped up by the KubeAdmissionControlConfig example while migrating to the new Talos 1.14 configuration schema.

The example KubeAdmissionControlConfig includes kube-system in the PodSecurity namespace exemptions, so I kept it in my patch and added cilium-system alongside it.

apiVersion: v1alpha1
kind: KubeAdmissionControlConfig
name: PodSecurity
configuration:
    apiVersion: pod-security.admission.config.k8s.io/v1alpha1
...
    exemptions:
        namespaces:
            - kube-system # I assumed this had to stay as it was documented
            - cilium-system
...
    kind: PodSecurityConfiguration

It turns out talosctl gen config already includes kube-system, and the patch appends the supplied namespaces. Running talosctl gen config test https://10.xx.xx.xx:6443 --config-patch=@admission.yaml resulted in the KubeAdmissionControlConfig having a duplicate:

...
    exemptions:
        namespaces:
            - kube-system
            - kube-system # oh no!
            - cilium-system
...

This caused the kube-apiserver to fail to start with:

talosctl -n 10.xx.xx.xx logs --namespace cri 'kube-system/kube-apiserver-<node>:kube-apiserver:0aa3972d7b1d'
...
10.xx.xx.xx: 2026-09-10T15:38:48.011416929Z stderr F E0910 15:38:48.011279 1 run.go:72] "command failed" err="failed to apply admission: failed to initialize admission plugin \"PodSecurity\": PodSecurity invalid: exemptions.namespaces[1]: Duplicate value: \"kube-system\""

The append behavior seems intentional, but I didn’t realize the example showed a complete configuration rather than something I could use directly as a patch.

Could we add a short note explaining that kube-system is already included by default, and that a patch should only list the additional namespaces? Or use a different namespace as an example:

apiVersion: v1alpha1
kind: KubeAdmissionControlConfig
name: PodSecurity
configuration:
  exemptions:
    namespaces:
      - cilium-system

After fixing this, the update went smooth as usual. Big thanks for making the Configuration document map, it was very helpful!

talosctl version
Client:
	Tag:         v1.14.0
	SHA:         undefined
	Built:       2026-09-03T06:04:55Z
	Go version:  go1.27.1
	OS/Arch:     linux/amd64

Contributor guide

No contributing guide indexed for this repository

First steps

  1. Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
  2. Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
  3. Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
  4. Open a pull request that references the issue number.

Research direction

Open /talos/v1.14/reference/configuration/kubernetes/kubeadmissioncontrolconfig and review the KubeAdmissionControlConfig example, especially the PodSecurity namespace exemptions. Update the example or add a note to explain that kube-system is already included and patches should list only additional namespaces, then verify the rendered documentation is clear.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Assessment

Domain
documentation
Issue type
Documentation
Difficulty
1/5
Estimated time
Under an hour
Activity status
Active
Clarity
Clearly specified
Newbie friendliness
85/100

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.