Fix linting and formatting inconsistencies across codebase
Nobody has claimed this yet.
Assessment
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Newbie friendliness
- 35/100
- Issue type
- Refactor
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Activity status
- Stale
- Tech stack
- eslint, javascript, webpack
- Domain
- build-system, tooling
Research direction
Start with the listed files, .prettierrc.yml, .eslintrc, and .prettierignore, then run yarn lint --fix to identify remaining issues. Check the ReScript-generated JSX separately and run bundle exec rubocop. Done means the JavaScript lint, RuboCop, and CI checks pass without warnings or offenses.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Description
Background
During the Babel to SWC migration (#666), we discovered several files with formatting inconsistencies that don't match the project's Prettier and ESLint configurations.
Files with Formatting Issues
The following files have formatting that doesn't match current linter rules:
client/app/packs/server-bundle.js- Uses double quotes instead of single quotesconfig/webpack/clientWebpackConfig.js- Missing proper file endingconfig/webpack/commonWebpackConfig.js- Inconsistent line wrapping and trailing commasconfig/webpack/development.js- Extra blank linesclient/app/bundles/comments/rescript/RescriptShow/ror_components/RescriptShow.jsx- ReScript-generated file with double quotes
Proposed Solution
Create a focused PR to:
- Run
yarn lint --fixacross the entire codebase - Fix any linting errors that can't be auto-fixed
- Ensure all files conform to
.prettierrc.ymland.eslintrcrules - Consider updating
.prettierignoreto exclude ReScript-generated files if needed
Why Separate PR?
- Keeps PRs focused on specific changes
- Makes code review easier
- Separates functional changes from formatting changes
- Establishes a clean baseline for future linting
Acceptance Criteria
- All files pass
yarn lintwithout warnings - All files pass
bundle exec rubocopwithout offenses - Formatting is consistent across the codebase
- CI linting checks pass
- Dominant language
- JavaScript
- Stars
- 1.7k
- Forks
- 370
- Avg merge
- 2d 15h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 6
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
More from shakacode/react-webpack-rails-tutorial
-
enhancement
Difficulty 4/5 3-5 days Newbie friendliness 42/100
shakacode/react-webpack-rails-tutorial#731 · 1 comment ·
-
documentation
Difficulty 4/5 3-5 days Newbie friendliness 50/100
-
question
Difficulty 4/5 3-5 days Newbie friendliness 35/100
-
enhancement
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 55/100
-
enhancement
Difficulty 5/5 Over a week Newbie friendliness 28/100
All issues in shakacode/react-webpack-rails-tutorial
Similar issues
-
code-quality refactoring
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 84/100
github/gh-aw-firewall#8816 ·
-
integration:quickjs org:external priority:backlog topic:code-interpreter topic:middleware type:feature
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 74/100
langchain-ai/deepagents#6450 ·
-
optimization optimization:agents-md-curator
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 86/100
githubnext/gh-aw-cao#13143 ·
-
status: needs triage
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 88/100
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 88/100