shadowsocks / shadowsocks/shadowsocks-rust
[Feature Request] Please support SO_REUSEPORT, just as ss-libev does.
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Rust
- Stars
- 10.9k
- Forks
- 1.5k
- Avg merge
- 4d 15h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 5
Description
I was trying to migrate from ss-libev to ss-rust. Due to some compatibility issues, I cannot run a single sslocal instance with multiple server in configuration files. Instead, I need to run two sslocal instances, each configured as a server, listening on the same port. I will use SO_REUSEPORT to achieve load balancing by listening on the same port.
我正在尝试从ss-libev转向ss-rust。因为一些兼容性原因，目前我无法使用运行一个sslocal实例 + 配置文件填写多个server的模式。而是需要运行两个sslocal实例，各使用一个server配置，通过监听相同的端口，利用SO_REUSEPORT实现监听同一端口进行负载均衡。
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
The issue names no files, tests, or entry points. Start by locating the listener setup and existing socket-option handling, then verify that two sslocal instances configured as servers can bind the same port with SO_REUSEPORT and distribute connections.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- rust
- Domain
- networking
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Newbie friendliness
- 35/100