shadowsocks / shadowsocks/shadowsocks-rust
Feature Request: Enable multiuser support through a single port
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Rust
- Stars
- 10.9k
- Forks
- 1.5k
- Avg merge
- 4d 15h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 5
Description
Since Shadowsocks 2022 is a different protocol that many clients don't support, the standard Shadowsocks server should enable multiuser functionality through a single port. While Xray-core already has a similar feature, it's important for the official project to adopt this capability as well.
Xray-core configuration sample that support similar functionality:
{
"inbounds": [
{
"port": 1234,
"protocol": "shadowsocks",
"settings": {
"clients": [
{
"password": "example_user_1",
"method": "aes-128-gcm"
},
{
"password": "example_user_2",
"method": "aes-256-gcm"
},
{
"password": "example_user_3",
"method": "chacha20-poly1305"
}
],
"network": "tcp,udp"
}
}
],
}
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start by reviewing the existing standard Shadowsocks server configuration and protocol handling, then compare them with the Xray-core configuration sample in the issue. Done means multiple clients with different passwords and encryption methods can share one port while supporting TCP and UDP.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- rust
- Domain
- networking
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Newbie friendliness
- 35/100