Use a faster hash function
Open
Nobody has claimed this yet.
performance
- Dominant language
- Rust
- Stars
- 212
- Forks
- 84
- Avg merge
- 1d 2h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 6
Description
e.g. rustc's FnvHasher
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
The issue names no files, tests, or entry points. Start by locating the current hash implementation in the repository and identify how its performance is measured; compare that path with rustc's FnvHasher and consider the work done when the faster hash function is used without breaking existing behavior.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- rust
- Domain
- performance
- Issue type
- Refactor
- Difficulty
- 3/5
- Estimated time
- 1-2 days
- Activity status
- Quiet
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 45/100