to_polygons(labels) turns a label containing a hole into an invalid MultiPolygon with the hole counted as area
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Python
- Stars
- 394
- Forks
- 95
- Avg merge
- 4d 3h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 7
Description
[!NOTE]
This whole message is AI-generated. The issue was automatically discovered and reported by an AI agent (Claude) during an autonomous bug hunt on thespatialdatacode base. It has not been verified or triaged by a human yet; theneeds: triagelabel is set so that a maintainer can confirm it. The reproduction script below was executed by the agent in an isolated environment (see Environment) and its output is pasted verbatim.
Summary
A 5×5 label with a 1-pixel hole (true area 24) becomes MultiPolygon, is_valid=False, area 25.0. Inner contours should become interiors of the enclosing polygon.
Severity (agent's assessment): medium — invalid geometries break downstream sjoin/overlay/clip; 24 of 3,556 polygons are invalid on the CosMx sandbox dataset
Where: src/spatialdata/_core/operations/vectorize.py::_region_props_to_polygon (every contour from skimage.measure.find_contours becomes an independent Polygon wrapped in a MultiPolygon)
Expected behaviour
A valid Polygon with one interior ring and area 24.
Reproduction
Save as repro.py and run uv run repro.py (the PEP 723 header pins spatialdata to the commit the bug was found on; replace the URL fragment with @main to test the current main branch).
# /// script
# requires-python = ">=3.12"
# dependencies = [
# "spatialdata @ git+https://github.com/scverse/spatialdata.git@ccf1ea048d054b6624214bf618008a9f9ae223e0",
# ]
# ///
"""to_polygons(labels) turns a label with a hole into an invalid MultiPolygon whose area includes the hole."""
import warnings
import numpy as np
from spatialdata import to_polygons
from spatialdata.models import Labels2DModel
warnings.simplefilter("ignore")
arr = np.zeros((7, 7), dtype=np.uint16)
arr[1:6, 1:6] = 1
arr[3, 3] = 0 # 5x5 square with a one-pixel hole -> true area 24
polys = to_polygons(Labels2DModel.parse(arr))
g = polys.geometry.iloc[0]
print(f"geometry type={g.geom_type}, is_valid={g.is_valid}, area={g.area} (expected: valid Polygon with one interior, area 24.0)")
bug = (not g.is_valid) or abs(g.area - 24.0) > 1e-9
print("VERDICT:", "BUG REPRODUCED" if bug else "NOT REPRODUCED")
Observed output
geometry type=MultiPolygon, is_valid=False, area=25.0 (expected: valid Polygon with one interior, area 24.0)
VERDICT: BUG REPRODUCED
Possible fix direction (unverified)
Build polygons with shapely.polygonize/build_area from the contour rings, or classify contours by containment (Polygon(outer, holes=[...])); add make_valid() as a safety net and a test with a labelled ring.
Environment
uv run repro.py with the PEP 723 metadata in the script (fresh, isolated environment; spatialdata built from main @ ccf1ea0 (2026-08-28); Python 3.13, latest releases of the dependencies at run time: pandas 3.0, anndata 0.13, zarr 3.3, dask 2026.8, numpy 2.5, geopandas 1.1, shapely 2.1). macOS (arm64). Also reproduced in a second environment with pandas 2.3.3 / anndata 0.12.11 / numpy 2.4.4 / zarr 3.2.1.
Automatically generated; discovered by an AI agent (Claude) and not yet reviewed by a human.
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start with src/spatialdata/_core/operations/vectorize.py::_region_props_to_polygon and run the provided repro.py with uv. Compare the resulting geometry with the expected valid Polygon containing one interior ring and area 24.0, then add a regression test for the labelled ring case if the repository’s test location can be identified.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- numpy, python
- Domain
- data
- Issue type
- Bug
- Difficulty
- 3/5
- Estimated time
- 1-2 days
- Activity status
- Active
- Clarity
- Clearly specified
- Newbie friendliness
- 64/100