scverse / scverse/spatialdata-plot
`pl.show()` leading to `ValueError` due to mismatch between number of axes and number of panels
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Python
- Stars
- 86
- Forks
- 21
- Avg merge
- 14h 50m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 3
Description
Report
Blocking a release. To reproduce please run notebook_spatial_query.ipynb from spaitaldata-notebooks.
Some notebooks started throwing some ValueError due to a mismatch between the number of axes and the number of panels in the plot. If possible, I would try to be backward compatible.
INFO - SpatialData object, with associated Zarr store: /Users/macbook/embl/projects/basel/spatialdata-integration-testing/dependencies/spatialdata-sandbox/visium/data.zarr
INFO - ├── Images
INFO - │ ├── 'ST8059048_hires_image': DataArray[cyx] (3, 2000, 1969)
INFO - │ ├── 'ST8059048_lowres_image': DataArray[cyx] (3, 600, 591)
INFO - │ ├── 'ST8059050_hires_image': DataArray[cyx] (3, 2000, 1968)
INFO - │ └── 'ST8059050_lowres_image': DataArray[cyx] (3, 600, 590)
INFO - ├── Shapes
INFO - │ ├── 'ST8059048': GeoDataFrame shape: (2987, 2) (2D shapes)
INFO - │ └── 'ST8059050': GeoDataFrame shape: (3497, 2) (2D shapes)
INFO - └── Tables
INFO - └── 'table': AnnData (6484, 31053)
INFO - with coordinate systems:
INFO - ▸ 'ST8059048', with elements:
INFO - ST8059048_hires_image (Images), ST8059048 (Shapes)
INFO - ▸ 'ST8059048_downscaled_lowres', with elements:
INFO - ST8059048_lowres_image (Images), ST8059048 (Shapes)
INFO - ▸ 'ST8059050', with elements:
INFO - ST8059050_hires_image (Images), ST8059050 (Shapes)
INFO - ▸ 'ST8059050_downscaled_lowres', with elements:
INFO - ST8059050_lowres_image (Images), ST8059050 (Shapes)
INFO -
INFO - Ending Cell 3------------------------------------------
INFO - Executing Cell 4---------------------------------------
INFO - Ending Cell 4------------------------------------------
INFO - Executing Cell 5---------------------------------------
INFO - /Users/macbook/embl/projects/basel/spatialdata-integration-testing/dependencies/spatialdata/src/spatialdata/_core/spatialdata.py:170: UserWarning: The table is annotating 'ST8059050', which is not present in the SpatialData object.
INFO - self.validate_table_in_spatialdata(v)
INFO - /Users/macbook/embl/projects/basel/spatialdata-integration-testing/dependencies/spatialdata/src/spatialdata/_core/spatialdata.py:170: UserWarning: The table is annotating 'ST8059050', which is not present in the SpatialData object.
INFO - self.validate_table_in_spatialdata(v)
Again, session_info2 seems to be uninformative. Please let me know if you can't reproduce and I will dig deeper.
Versions
| Dependency | Version |
| ----------------------------- | ------- |
| sphinxcontrib-devhelp | 2.0.0 |
| sphinxcontrib-htmlhelp | 2.1.0 |
| sphinxcontrib-serializinghtml | 2.0.0 |
| session-info2 | 0.3 |
| sphinxcontrib-qthelp | 2.0.0 |
| sphinxcontrib-bibtex | 2.6.5 |
| sphinxcontrib-jsmath | 1.0.1 |
| sphinxcontrib-applehelp | 2.0.0 |
| setuptools | 80.9.0 |
| Component | Info |
| --------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| Python | 3.13.0 | packaged by conda-forge | (main, Nov 27 2024, 19:18:26) [Clang 18.1.8 ] |
| OS | macOS-26.5.1-arm64-arm-64bit-Mach-O |
| Updated | 2026-07-02 17:52 |
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start by running notebook_spatial_query.ipynb from spaitaldata-notebooks and reproduce the ValueError raised by pl.show(). Trace the mismatch between plot axes and panels, then verify that the notebook completes successfully while preserving backward compatibility where possible.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- python
- Domain
- data-visualization
- Issue type
- Bug
- Difficulty
- 3/5
- Estimated time
- 1-2 days
- Activity status
- Quiet
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 45/100