scrapinghub / scrapinghub/dateparser
Improvement of contribution docs.
Open
Nobody has claimed this yet.
Type: Documentation
Type: Enhancement
- Dominant language
- Python
- Stars
- 2.9k
- Forks
- 520
- Avg merge
- 22h 56m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 6
Description
Improvement for the docs which cover about contribution to the repository , should be more elaborated because it does not do much help for the new contributors . @Gallaecio , @gavishpoddar . What are your opinions?
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Review the repository's existing contribution documentation and identify which parts do not help new contributors. Clarify the needed guidance before editing; done means the contribution docs provide more useful, elaborated instructions for newcomers.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- python
- Domain
- documentation
- Issue type
- Documentation
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 30/100