scrapinghub / scrapinghub/dateparser

Bad handling of non-integer relative dates

Open
#670 1 comment 1 reaction 0 assignees View on GitHub

Nobody has claimed this yet.

Type: Bug
Dominant language
Python
Stars
2.9k
Forks
520
Avg merge
22h 56m
Merged PRs (30d)
6

Description

In [67]: dateparser.parse('2.5h', settings={'PARSERS': ['relative-time'], 'PREFER_DATES_FROM': 'future'})             
Out[67]: datetime.datetime(2020, 5, 10, 12, 44, 41, 394558)

In [68]: dateparser.parse('2,5h', settings={'PARSERS': ['relative-time'], 'PREFER_DATES_FROM': 'future'})             
Out[68]: datetime.datetime(2020, 5, 10, 12, 44, 55, 313879)

In [69]: datetime.datetime.now()                           
Out[69]: datetime.datetime(2020, 5, 10, 7, 45, 4, 867612)

It should be 2.5h in the future, not 5h.

Contributor guide

Open the contributing guide

First steps

  1. Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
  2. Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
  3. Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
  4. Open a pull request that references the issue number.

Research direction

Start by reproducing the reported dateparser.parse examples with the relative-time parser, then trace how decimal values such as 2.5h and 2,5h are interpreted. Done means both forms represent 2.5 hours in the future rather than 5 hours, with regression coverage for the reported behavior.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Assessment

Tech stack
python
Domain
backend
Issue type
Bug
Difficulty
3/5
Estimated time
1-2 days
Activity status
Stale
Clarity
Mostly clear
Newbie friendliness
48/100

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.