Time-of-flight: food for thought
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Python
- Stars
- 1
- Forks
- 3
- Avg merge
- 2d 11h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 17
Description
Notes and open questions from a meeting with Garrett Granroth
-
How good is the mcstas source compared to real source?
-
Can you use calibration to go backwards and modify the source?
-
Is the moderator stable (in time)? Is the source stable (in time)?
-
Could we make an iterative procedure to tweak the source profile going back and forth from calibration?
-
SANS: there is no silicon powder for sans for calibration. Could you expect that the source looks the same for a different instrument and use the calibration from that instrument (e.g. an instrument right next to Loki)? -> Moderators might not be completely uniform. Some bright spots are seen at SNS.
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
The issue contains meeting notes and open questions about source quality, calibration, moderator stability, and SANS calibration, but names no files, tests, or entry points. First clarify which question should become a scoped change and define the data or validation needed to consider it complete.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Domain
- data
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 20/100