[Image normalization workflow]: `NormalizedImage` could be renamed to `TransmissionImage`
Open
Nobody has claimed this yet.
essimaging
- Dominant language
- Python
- Stars
- 1
- Forks
- 3
- Avg merge
- 2d 11h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 17
Description
To avoid the 'normalized' name clash between normalized to proton-charge and normalized to open beam, the final NormalizedImage (normalized to open beam) could be renamed to TransmissionImage (name I gto from TBL instrument scientist).
Need to double-check that this term is widely used in the community.
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start by locating the image normalization workflow and all uses of NormalizedImage; no specific files or tests are named in the issue. Check whether TransmissionImage is widely used in the neutron-scattering community, then determine whether the rename can be applied consistently and document the terminology decision.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- python
- Domain
- data
- Issue type
- Refactor
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 35/100