scikit-learn / scikit-learn/blog
predict_proba
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- SCSS
- Stars
- 24
- Forks
- 30
- Avg merge
- 6d 2h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 1
Description
Python’s «predict_proba» Doesn’t Actually Predict Probabilities (and How to Fix It)
How to assess and repair probability miscalibration
https://towardsdatascience.com/pythons-predict-proba-doesn-t-actually-predict-probabilities-and-how-to-fix-it-f582c21d63fc
https://twitter.com/predict_addict/status/1591012774011760640?s=46&t=jvC6ncYQ3rkb7u9QLOk5yg
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Read the linked Towards Data Science article and Twitter post first; the issue does not name a blog file, test, or entry point. Clarify whether this should become a scikit-learn blog article about probability calibration, then define its scope and acceptance criteria before starting.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- python, scikit-learn
- Domain
- documentation, machine-learning
- Issue type
- Documentation
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 25/100