[BUG] `x509.private_key_managed` states do not honor all `file.managed` arguments

Description

In the documentation, it's said for x509.private_key_managed salt states:

Any kwargs supported by file.managed are supported.

But it's wrong it only honors part of it

salt/states/x509.py:225:def _get_file_args(name, **kwargs):
salt/states/x509.py-226-    valid_file_args = [
salt/states/x509.py-227-        "user",
salt/states/x509.py-228-        "group",
salt/states/x509.py-229-        "mode",
salt/states/x509.py-230-        "makedirs",
salt/states/x509.py-231-        "dir_mode",
salt/states/x509.py-232-        "backup",
salt/states/x509.py-233-        "create",
salt/states/x509.py-234-        "follow_symlinks",
salt/states/x509.py-235-        "check_cmd",
salt/states/x509.py-236-    ]
salt/states/x509.py-237-    file_args = {}
salt/states/x509.py-238-    extra_args = {}
salt/states/x509.py-239-    for k, v in kwargs.items():
salt/states/x509.py-240-        if k in valid_file_args:
salt/states/x509.py-241-            file_args[k] = v
salt/states/x509.py-242-        else:
salt/states/x509.py-243-            extra_args[k] = v
salt/states/x509.py-244-    file_args["name"] = name
salt/states/x509.py-245-    return file_args, extra_args

Not sure every kwargs of file.managed are needed here but to me at least replace could be helpful if we do not want to replace the key when it already exists

(Right now as a workaround I use an unless: test -f "my_key_path" on my x509.private_key_managed state)

Start in salt/states/x509.py at _get_file_args and compare its accepted arguments with the file.managed arguments described in the documentation. Check how x509.private_key_managed handles replace and other file.managed kwargs; done means the supported arguments are honored consistently with the documentation.