Improve e2e tests with Cypress
Nobody has claimed this yet.
Assessment
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Newbie friendliness
- 35/100
- Issue type
- Feature
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Activity status
- Stale
- Tech stack
- cypress, typescript
Research direction
Start by tracing the Cypress e2e flow, the cy.acceptCookiesAndSecurityFeedbackModal() command, and the deploy/e2e execution configuration. Check how test results and failures are currently reported in pull requests. Done means failures provide accurate feedback without blocking merges, the new localStorage-based command exists alongside the current one, and deployment and e2e runs use the intended order.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Description
Overview
We are gathering in this tickets several improvements that should be addressed in the current e2e flow
Requirements
- e2e action result in PRs
Currently the e2e action always ends with a succesfully execution giving the sensation the tests had passed. We need to show the corrrect feedback but continue to allow the PR to be merged when the tests are failing:
- New command to improve
cy.acceptCookiesAndSecurityFeedbackModal()
The current approach is about click the buttons until the cookies and modal are dismissed. A better approach should be create the localStorage items necessary to avoid the banner and modal to be showed.
We will create a new command and maintain the current one as is useful for some tests.
- Create precedence between deploy and e2e execution
We need to create a precedence between the deploy action and the e2e execution for avoid running the tests against the wrong sites the first time we create a PR or make a merge to the main branches
- Dominant language
- TypeScript
- Stars
- 116
- Forks
- 84
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
More from safe-global/safe-react-apps
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 45/100
safe-global/safe-react-apps#863 · 1 comment ·
-
Difficulty 3/5 1-2 days Newbie friendliness 52/100
safe-global/safe-react-apps#854 ·
-
Difficulty 3/5 1-2 days Newbie friendliness 45/100
safe-global/safe-react-apps#852 · 1 reaction ·
-
Difficulty 4/5 3-5 days Newbie friendliness 35/100
safe-global/safe-react-apps#839 · 2 comments ·
-
Difficulty 4/5 3-5 days Newbie friendliness 38/100
safe-global/safe-react-apps#835 ·
All issues in safe-global/safe-react-apps
Similar issues
-
clawsweeper:fix-shape-clear clawsweeper:queueable-fix clawsweeper:source-repro impact:ux-friction issue-rating: 🦞 diamond lobster no-stale P3
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 78/100
-
community first-timers-only good first issue hacktoberfest help wanted low hanging fruit up-for-grabs
Difficulty 1/5 Under an hour Newbie friendliness 76/100
-
code-quality refactoring
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 84/100
github/gh-aw-firewall#8816 ·
-
integration:quickjs org:external priority:backlog topic:code-interpreter topic:middleware type:feature
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 74/100
langchain-ai/deepagents#6450 ·
-
Difficulty 1/5 Under an hour Newbie friendliness 88/100
vercel/react-tweet#225 ·