better structuredClone support
Open
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- JavaScript
- Stars
- 66
- Forks
- 22
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
I have created this page to test out how good some packages are at mimicing structuredClone and also testing out how fast and efficent they are
https://jimmywarting.github.io/3th-party-structured-clone-wpt
Maybe you want imporove the score...?
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start with the linked structuredClone comparison page to identify which CBOR behaviors are missing or slow. Review the repository implementation and compare its results with the page's tests; done means a specific improvement is demonstrated in the comparison rather than a general score goal.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- javascript
- Domain
- backend
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 25/100