ruvnet / ruvnet/worldgraph

Strategic experiment: pose indexed landmark memory for bounded long horizon world state

Open
#4 0 comments 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub

Nobody has claimed this yet.

Dominant language
TypeScript
Stars
29
Forks
2
Avg merge
40m
Merged PRs (30d)
2

Description

Finding

ReWorld, submitted 2026-08-24, separates short horizon control from long horizon memory. At inference it keeps a fixed budget KV cache backed by a pose indexed landmark bank and retrieves landmarks nearest the current pose. The authors report that a fixed 12 chunk cache can revisit the starting view after a 64 second, 384 latent rollout where a sliding window has evicted the evidence and full KV attention runs out of memory.

RuV hypothesis

WorldGraph, RuField, RuView, and RuVector can reuse the memory architecture without reproducing the video generator: retain a bounded hot temporal cache for current control and a spatially indexed landmark bank for durable world evidence.

Proposed primitive

SpatialLandmarkBank<T> keyed by pose or spatial cell with:

  • stable landmark identity
  • pose and uncertainty covariance
  • observation time and freshness
  • source provenance root
  • content hash
  • modality and embedding references
  • quality and revisit score
  • bounded per region retention policy

Retrieval combines spatial proximity, confidence, freshness, provenance diversity, and semantic relevance. The hot cache stays bounded independently of total exploration time.

Experiment

Use recorded RuView or synthetic spatial trajectories with explicit out and back revisits.

Compare:

  1. sliding temporal memory
  2. full retained history until memory limit
  3. bounded hot cache plus pose indexed landmark bank

Measure revisit accuracy, spatial consistency, memory bytes, lookup latency, stale landmark rate, uncertainty calibration, and robustness to pose noise. Include missing observations and intentionally wrong pose updates.

Security and governance

Landmarks are evidence, not authority. Preserve source provenance and tenancy. A retrieved landmark cannot expand capabilities or overwrite authoritative state without the normal Core Memory or RVM policy path.

Acceptance criteria

At the same hot memory budget, candidate retains at least 2 times longer revisit horizon than sliding memory with less than 10% p95 retrieval latency overhead, no cross tenant leakage, and graceful degradation under injected pose noise.

Reference

arXiv:2608.23565, submitted 2026-08-24.

Contributor guide

No contributing guide indexed for this repository

First steps

  1. Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
  2. Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
  3. Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
  4. Open a pull request that references the issue number.

Research direction

No implementation files or tests are named. Start by mapping the existing WorldGraph, RuField, RuView, RuVector, Core Memory, and RVM policy paths before designing the experiment around recorded or synthetic trajectories. Done means meeting the stated revisit-horizon, latency, tenant-isolation, and pose-noise degradation criteria.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Assessment

Tech stack
rust, typescript
Domain
ai, robotics, security
Issue type
Feature
Difficulty
5/5
Estimated time
Over a week
Activity status
Active
Clarity
Mostly clear
Newbie friendliness
28/100

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.