ruvnet / ruvnet/ruflo

Suggested Contribution Pattern?

Open
#651 1 comment 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub

Nobody has claimed this yet.

Dominant language
TypeScript
Stars
72.8k
Forks
8.6k
Avg merge
2d 23h
Merged PRs (30d)
82

Description

I'm trying to get an understanding of what the best way to contribute PRs to this codebase, given the manner in which Alpha is being developed in distinct version based branches.

Should PRs always be based on the latest Alpha branch? Should they be rebased to latest Alpha branch if there is an Alpha release prior to review/merge?

I've submitted several PRs against the main branch, and now realize that is not helpful. Looking to understand how best to reduce friction in contributed claude-flow features and bugfixes.

Contributor guide

Open the contributing guide

First steps

  1. Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
  2. Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
  3. Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
  4. Open a pull request that references the issue number.

Research direction

No file, test, or entry point is named. Start by reviewing the repository's Alpha and main branch workflow and the existing contribution guidance, then document the agreed branch, rebasing, and pull-request expectations so contributors can tell which base to use.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Assessment

Tech stack
git, github
Domain
developer-experience, documentation
Issue type
Documentation
Difficulty
4/5
Estimated time
3-5 days
Activity status
Active
Clarity
Needs clarification
Newbie friendliness
30/100

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.