TemplateGenerator ignores page analysis and always returns hardcoded Google Finance selectors

Hey, I was trying to use auto-browser easy on a normal non-finance website, but I kept getting finance-related extraction behavior.

After checking the code, I noticed this in:

auto-browser/browser_automation/template_generator.py

def _create_selectors(self, analysis: str) -> Dict[str, Selector]:
    """Create selectors from analysis result."""
    selectors = {}

    # Common selectors for finance data
    selectors.update({
        'stock_price': Selector(css='.YMlKec.fxKbKc', ...),
        'price_change': Selector(css='.P2Luy.Ez2Ioe', ...),
        'company_name': Selector(css='.zzDege', ...),
        'market_cap': Selector(css='[data-metric="MARKET_CAP"] .P6K39c', ...),
        'volume': Selector(css='[data-metric="VOLUME"] .P6K39c', ...),
        'news_items': Selector(css='.yY3Lee', ...),
        'search_input': Selector(css='.Ax4B8.ZAGvjd', ...),
    })

    return selectors

It looks like _create_selectors() receives analysis but does not actually use it. So even when the page is not Google Finance or stock-related, the generated template still gets finance selectors like stock_price, market_cap, volume, etc.

It seems to fall back to these hardcoded finance selectors.

Expected behavior:

If the page is not finance-related, it should not generate finance selectors.
Either the method should parse the analysis result properly, or at least use generic selectors as a fallback.

I can open a small PR for this

Start in auto-browser/browser_automation/template_generator.py at TemplateGenerator._create_selectors(), then trace how the analysis argument is produced and passed by auto-browser easy. Verify the behavior with a normal non-finance website. Done means the generated template no longer receives Google Finance selectors for non-finance pages and uses behavior supported by the analysis or a generic fallback.