Test environment setup for validated HR/BR/pose accuracy — ADR-079 follow-up

Hi @ruvnet,

I'm using wifi-densepose with Lonely Binary ESP32-S3 nodes for a vital signs monitoring project. I've done a deep review of the codebase including ADR-079, ADR-069, and the CHANGELOG.

I have a few questions about your validated test environment:

1. Room setup: The repo mentions 4×4m, 4×5m, and 5×4m in different docs. What room dimensions did you use when achieving your best HR/BR accuracy results?

2. ESP32 placement: ADR-079 mentions camera FOV must cover the sensing volume. What height and positions worked best for vitals detection specifically?

3. HR/BR validation: ADR-069 says "vitals ranges checked" but I couldn't find a published accuracy comparison against ground truth (oximeter etc.). Did you validate HR/BR against a reference device? If so what accuracy did you achieve?

4. ADR-079 P7-P9 are marked Pending — is there a branch or fork where the camera-supervised training pipeline was completed?

Any guidance on your validated setup would help me uerstand how close I am to your best results.

Thanks for the great open source work.

Start with ADR-079, ADR-069, and the CHANGELOG, then trace the referenced P7-P9 status and any documented test setup. Compare the room dimensions, ESP32 placement, and HR/BR validation details requested in the issue. Done means the repository documents the validated setup, reference-device accuracy, and whether a completed training branch or fork exists.