rustsec / rustsec/advisory-db

Consider add PURL to advisories

Open
#2,359 3 comments 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub

Nobody has claimed this yet.

Dominant language
No language data
Stars
1.2k
Forks
544
Avg merge
1d 10h
Merged PRs (30d)
45

Description

crates.io now list a PURL on each crates page, like pkg:cargo/aho-corasick@1.1.3 for https://crates.io/crates/aho-corasick

It would be awesome to also adopt PURL in the advisories here, especially since CVE.org is fast tracking adopting PURL in the CVE schema.

Tell me how I can help!

Contributor guide

Open the contributing guide

First steps

  1. Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
  2. Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
  3. Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
  4. Open a pull request that references the issue number.

Research direction

No files, tests, or entry points are named. Start by reviewing the repository's advisory format and existing entries, then compare the Cargo PURL format with the current advisory schema and CVE's PURL direction. Done means the scope is resolved and advisories can consistently represent the appropriate PURL with any needed validation updated.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Assessment

Tech stack
rust
Domain
security
Issue type
Feature
Difficulty
4/5
Estimated time
3-5 days
Activity status
Quiet
Clarity
Mostly clear
Newbie friendliness
48/100

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.