Lazy evaluation chain
Nobody has claimed this yet.
Assessment
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Newbie friendliness
- 20/100
- Issue type
- Feature
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Activity status
- Stale
- Tech stack
- rust
- Domain
- data, performance
Research direction
Start with the linked pull-request discussion, then inspect the existing ArrayBase methods that could move into ArrayOps. Review the proposed ArrayBase.chain(), LazyChain, and LazyChain.eval() API along with the ownership and copy-versus-in-place decision points. Done requires those design questions to be resolved and the lazy operation chain specified.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Description
Motivation
Following from discussion starting here: https://github.com/rust-ndarray/ndarray/pull/1042#issuecomment-957134294
With contemporary systems, moving the data from memory into caches and registers often dominates the runtime of numerical algorithms depending on how many arithmetic operations they perform relative to each memory access. Fusing operations from multiple passes into a single pass increases this ratio and thereby the likelihood of efficient CPU utilisation. [1]
In theory this problem is solved using loops and/or mapv, but this doesn't provide a very user-friendly interface. Users who want to work at a high level still want to be able to use arr.pow(), arr.log() etc, but also retain the speed of this per-element processing (rather than applying each operation to each element and then the next operation to each element).
Proposed Changes
- We move a subset of the
ArrayBasemethods into anArrayOpstrait. Note: this probably can't be all methods because it can only work for methods that return an array, soaxes,as_slice,getetc don't necessarily make sense - This trait gets implemented by
ArrayBase, but also a new struct calledLazyChain(or something idk) LazyChaingets created byArrayBase.chain()LazyChainwill own (?) anArrayBase, as well as a list of operations that will be sequentially applied to it- Then,
LazyChain.eval()runs these operations sequentially on each element of the owned array, and then returns the modified array
Decision Points
- Names for structs and traits
- Should
LazyChainreturn a copy or a modified in-place array? - Should
LazyChainown the array or just borrow it? Should we have two different types do each?
- Dominant language
- Rust
- Stars
- 4.3k
- Forks
- 391
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
More from rust-ndarray/ndarray
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 72/100
rust-ndarray/ndarray#1612 · 1 comment ·
-
Difficulty 4/5 3-5 days Newbie friendliness 48/100
rust-ndarray/ndarray#1617 · 1 comment ·
-
bug good first issue
Difficulty 3/5 1-2 days Newbie friendliness 68/100
rust-ndarray/ndarray#1615 · 1 comment ·
-
Difficulty 4/5 3-5 days Newbie friendliness 48/100
rust-ndarray/ndarray#1610 ·
-
Difficulty 3/5 1-2 days Newbie friendliness 72/100
rust-ndarray/ndarray#1609 ·
All issues in rust-ndarray/ndarray
Similar issues
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 86/100
kwakseongjae/auto-hwp#319 ·
-
area:cli bug filter-quality good first issue priority:medium
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 84/100
-
Difficulty 1/5 Under an hour Newbie friendliness 72/100
bevyengine/bevy#25861 ·
-
comp-datalake
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 88/100
ClickHouse/ClickHouse#121222 ·
-
enhancement remote
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 68/100