Some target features are not available in CI tests
Open
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Rust
- Stars
- 694
- Forks
- 336
- Avg merge
- 5d 14h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 9
Description
Some target features are not available in CI, so they may pose a risk of being skipped. This issue compiles a list of such target features for reference
{
"aarch64{,_be}": [
"cssc",
"ecv",
"faminmax",
"fp8",
"fp8dot2",
"fp8dot4",
"fp8fma",
"fpmr",
"lse128",
"lut",
"pauth-lr",
"rcpc3",
"sme2",
"sme2p1",
"sme-b16b16",
"sme-f16f16",
"sme-f8f16",
"sme-f8f32",
"sme-lutv2",
"ssbs",
"ssve-fp8dot2",
"ssve-fp8dot4",
"ssve-fp8fma",
"sve2p1",
"sve-b16b16",
"tme",
"wfxt"
],
"arm{,v7}": [
"pmull",
"crc",
"aes",
"sha2",
"i8mm",
"dotprod"
],
"riscv32": [
"unaligned-vector-mem",
"zicntr",
"zihpm",
"zihintpause",
"zimop",
"zawrs",
"zam",
"q",
"zfinx",
"zdinx",
"zhinx",
"zhinxmin",
"zcb",
"zcmop",
"j",
"p"
],
"riscv64": [
"unaligned-vector-mem",
"zicntr",
"zihpm",
"zihintpause",
"zimop",
"zawrs",
"zam",
"q",
"zfinx",
"zdinx",
"zhinx",
"zhinxmin",
"zcf",
"zcb",
"zcmop",
"j",
"p"
],
"powerpc{,64}": [
"vsx",
"power8",
"power8-altivec",
"power8-vector",
"power8-crypto",
"power9",
"power9-altivec",
"power9-vector"
],
"powerpc64le": [
"power8",
"power9",
"power9-altivec",
"power9-vector"
],
"s390x": [
"deflate-conversion",
"enhanced-sort",
"guarded-storage",
"nnp-assist",
"transactional-execution",
"vector-packed-decimal",
"vector-packed-decimal-enhancement",
"vector-packed-decimal-enhancement-2"
],
"loongarch64": [
"frecipe",
"div32",
"lam-bh",
"lamcas",
"ld-seq-sa",
"scq",
"lbt",
"lvz"
]
}
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
No file, test, or entry point is named; the issue only provides a reference list of target features by architecture. Start by locating the CI tests that exercise target-feature detection and compare their coverage with this list. Done would require an agreed scope and updated coverage or documentation for the missing features.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- rust
- Domain
- ci-cd, testing-qa
- Issue type
- Documentation
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 25/100