Consider providing an asc file for gpg checking for rustup-init
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Rust
- Stars
- 7k
- Forks
- 1.1k
- Avg merge
- 22h 40m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 46
Description
Currently all the security checks provided in rustup-init have little gain to new users downloading a file that may have gone rogue etc. This is considered TOFU (Trust On First Use) security.
For a more security aware user, it would be nice to permit them to use rustup still however providing them with the ability to check the asc of the download before running it.
There isn't a .asc described here https://internals.rust-lang.org/t/future-updates-to-the-rustup-distribution-format/4196 for this file either.
Related to #242 (this would still be considered TOFU security).
Basically my goal is to have a reproducible Docker file with verifiable security (I have this here: https://hub.docker.com/r/kingstontime/docker-rust/~/dockerfile/ but without rustup and currently without Cargo)
Perhaps a lightweight bashfile like the dockerfile that can easily be verified would be an option?
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
The issue names rustup-init and references the rustup distribution-format discussion, but no repository file or test. Start by tracing how rustup-init artifacts are published and checked, then define an .asc delivery and verification path; done means users can verify the download before execution and use it in a reproducible Docker workflow.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- rust
- Domain
- release, security
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 25/100