rust-lang / rust-lang/rustlings
Would it make sense to add an additional exercise to move_semantics?
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Rust
- Stars
- 64.2k
- Forks
- 11.3k
- Avg merge
- 5h 24m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 2
Description
Rustlings is amazing. Heartfelt thanks to everyone involved.
I just finished move_semantics6.rs which I found quite tricky but very helpful once I solved it and understood the necessary syntax to implement ownership in one spot and borrowing in another.
Would Rustlings benefit from another similar, perhaps just a smidge more complex exercise given the tricky nature of the subject matter?
Thanks again in any case! Just a thought :)
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start by reviewing move_semantics6.rs and the surrounding move_semantics exercises to understand the existing progression and identify what an additional exercise would teach. Confirm the desired scope with maintainers before implementing anything; done means a concrete new exercise has been added to the move_semantics set.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- rust
- Domain
- tooling
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 3/5
- Estimated time
- 1-2 days
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 25/100