Tuples or methods with two `unsafe` blocks are ugly formatted

Tuples or methods with two unsafe blocks are formatted as follows:

let (n, m) = (unsafe { NonZeroU16::new_unchecked(u16::MAX) }, unsafe {
    NonZeroU16::new_unchecked(u16::MAX)
});

let r = NonZeroU16::div_ceil(unsafe { NonZeroU16::new_unchecked(u16::MAX) }, unsafe {
    NonZeroU16::new_unchecked(u16::MAX)
});

I think this is ugly.

Similar code without unsafe blocks would be formatted as follows:

let (n, m) = (
    NonZeroU16::new(u16::MAX).unwrap(),
    NonZeroU16::new(u16::MAX).unwrap(),
);

let r = NonZeroU16::div_ceil(
    NonZeroU16::new(u16::MAX).unwrap(),
    NonZeroU16::new(u16::MAX).unwrap(),
);

Similar to this, I think the first example should be formatted like this:

let (n, m) = (
    unsafe { NonZeroU16::new_unchecked(u16::MAX) },
    unsafe { NonZeroU16::new_unchecked(u16::MAX) },
);

let r = NonZeroU16::div_ceil(
    unsafe { NonZeroU16::new_unchecked(u16::MAX) },
    unsafe { NonZeroU16::new_unchecked(u16::MAX) },
);

$ rustfmt --version
rustfmt 1.8.0-nightly (fabece9e94 2025-12-25)

Start by reproducing the two examples with rustfmt and compare the current output with the desired formatting shown in the issue. Trace the formatter behavior for multiple unsafe blocks in tuple and method-call arguments, then add coverage and confirm both examples format as requested.