group_imports reorders `use` statements arounds comments, changing their meaning

This is similar to https://github.com/rust-lang/rustfmt/issues/3720, but for group_imports settings such as StdExternalCrate. https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/126776 shows the consequences of that: it is now impossible to have a "chunk" of use statements that have a comment above them. rustfmt will happily reorder them and keep the comment attached to the immediate use item after it, therefore fundamentally changing its meaning. That's extremely frustrating -- having the tool make it essentially impossible to have comments that clarify the intent of my code.

In situations like this:

use a;
use b;
use c;

// comment
use d;
use e;

rustfmt should view the comment as "breaking apart" the use block into multiple blocks, similar to what it does if there was something else, like a mod, in place of the comment. group_imports should then be applied to both groups separately. That would avoid such semantics-altering reformatting.

Start by reproducing the issue with the provided use statements, comment, and group_imports setting such as StdExternalCrate, then compare the formatted output with the expected separate groups. Trace the formatter's import-grouping behavior and add a regression test showing that a comment between use blocks prevents them from being reordered together.