rust-lang / rust-lang/rustfmt

rustfmt eats comments in fn return type wrapped in parenthesis

Open
#5,870 7 comments 2 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub

Nobody has claimed this yet.

A-comments I-unexpectedly-removes-code
Dominant language
Rust
Stars
7k
Forks
1.1k
Avg merge
2d 13h
Merged PRs (30d)
24

Description

This code:

fn f() -> (/* is something */ bool) {}

Turns into this:

fn f() -> (bool) {}

Not too big of a deal as this isn't a tuple (due to the missing ,) and doesn't happen with tuples, but it should probably look for a comment here so it's retained after the programmer adds the , (and presumably other types, too)

Doesn't seem to happen in other places (like the type annotation for a local).

Contributor guide

Open the contributing guide

First steps

  1. Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
  2. Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
  3. Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
  4. Open a pull request that references the issue number.

Research direction

Start by running rustfmt on the issue's minimal function example and compare the output with the input comment. Trace the formatting path for a parenthesized function return type, then add coverage for retaining the comment and verify that the existing tuple and local type-annotation cases remain unchanged.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Assessment

Tech stack
rust
Domain
tooling
Issue type
Bug
Difficulty
3/5
Estimated time
1-2 days
Activity status
Quiet
Clarity
Mostly clear
Newbie friendliness
65/100

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.