Format MacroDef (macros 2.0)
Open
Nobody has claimed this yet.
A-macros
P-medium
unstable-language-feature
- Dominant language
- Rust
- Stars
- 7k
- Forks
- 1.1k
- Avg merge
- 2d 13h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 24
Description
Should share code with macro_rules I imagine. See FIXME in visitor.rs.
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start at the FIXME in visitor.rs and inspect how macro_rules definitions are currently formatted. Determine how MacroDef from macros 2.0 should share that formatting path, then verify that the resulting formatter behavior covers MacroDef definitions consistently with macro_rules.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- rust
- Domain
- tooling
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Newbie friendliness
- 35/100