rust-lang / rust-lang/rustc_codegen_gcc
Use rustfmt more and better
Open
Nobody has claimed this yet.
enhancement
- Dominant language
- Rust
- Stars
- 1.2k
- Forks
- 105
- Avg merge
- 8h 20m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 14
Description
I see currently two issues:
- It is not ran on some files
- the files in
tests/run
- the files in
- It doesn't seem to warn about a missing empty line around function definitions. (seems like
rustfmtdoesn't support this;blank_lines_lower_boundwill insert lines in many other places like between statements).
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Review the repository's Rust files and current rustfmt coverage, noting that tests/run is already covered. Then investigate rustfmt's support for blank_lines_lower_bound and the requested warnings around function definitions. Done means the intended files are covered and the blank-line requirement has a clear, validated resolution.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- rust
- Domain
- tooling
- Issue type
- Refactor
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Newbie friendliness
- 38/100