rust-lang / rust-lang/rustc-perf
on status page timeline, beta benchmark record looks broken
Open
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Rust
- Stars
- 733
- Forks
- 189
- Avg merge
- 10h 52m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 43
Description
Weird values in columns, duration, sha, kind:
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start at the status page timeline and inspect the beta benchmark record shown in the attached image, focusing on the duration, SHA, and kind columns. Reproduce the entry and trace the malformed values to their source; done means those columns display the correct benchmark data.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- rust
- Domain
- performance
- Issue type
- Bug
- Difficulty
- 3/5
- Estimated time
- 1-2 days
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 30/100