Tracking Issue for `Vec::as_non_null()`
Open
Nobody has claimed this yet.
A-collections
A-raw-pointers
C-tracking-issue
S-tracking-needs-to-bake
T-libs
- Dominant language
- Rust
- Stars
- 119k
- Forks
- 16.1k
- PR merge metrics
- PR metrics pending
Description
Feature gate: #![feature(vec_as_non_null)]
This is a tracking issue for Vec::as_non_null()
See also #157345 for a similar feature.
Public API
impl<T, A: Allocator> Vec<T, A> {
pub const fn as_non_null(&mut self) -> NonNull<T> { .... }
}
Steps / History
(Remember to update the S-tracking-* label when checking boxes.)
- ACP: https://github.com/rust-lang/libs-team/issues/440
- Implementation:
- https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/130624
- The above implementation added the method to the
box_vec_non_nullfeature, at the tracking issue https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/130364
- The above implementation added the method to the
- This method has
#[rustc_as_ptr]added to it, and is split out of thebox_vec_non_nullfeature into its own feature (this tracking issue): https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/157226
- https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/130624
- Final comment period (FCP)^1
- Stabilization PR
Unresolved Questions
- Confirm whether we want a
&selfor&mut selfargument.- See previous discussion at #t-opsem > Should `slice/Vec::as_non_null`take `&self` or `&mut self`? and Libs-API Meeting 2026-06-09
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start with the public API and the linked implementation PRs #130624 and #157226, then read the Zulip discussion and Libs-API meeting notes about the receiver choice. Done means resolving whether the method takes &self or &mut self, completing the final comment period, and opening the stabilization PR.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- rust
- Domain
- backend-api-design
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Quiet
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Newbie friendliness
- 25/100