Tracking Issue for core_ffi_c_extra
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Rust
- Stars
- 119k
- Forks
- 16.1k
- PR merge metrics
- PR metrics pending
Description
Feature gate: #![feature(core_ffi_c_extra)]
This is a tracking issue for providing the aliases for extra C types (c_wchar_t, c_intmax_t, c_iovec,...) via core::ffi. avoid the libc crate to provide better interoperability.
As now libc is looking for release 1.0
Public API
pub use core::ffi::{
c_intmax_t,
c_uintmax_t,
c_wchar_t,
c_wint_t,
c_wctype_t,
c_iovec,
};
After Move IoSlice and IoSliceMut to core::io, core::io::iovec is duplicate of
libc::iovec, we can merge then as core::c_iovec
Maybe there is other libc crate types can moved into core::ffi, we can listing them here.
Steps / History
(Remember to update the S-tracking-* label when checking boxes.)
- ACP: rust-lang/libs-team#...
- Implementation: #...
- Final comment period (FCP)^1
- Stabilization PR
Unresolved Questions
- None yet.
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start by reading the core::ffi public API listed in the issue and the referenced core::io::iovec context. The issue names no implementation files or tests, so first determine the relevant core library entry points and any additional libc types that belong in scope. Done requires resolving the API scope and completing the tracking steps through stabilization.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- rust
- Domain
- api
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Quiet
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 25/100