Tracking Issue for `new_range_remainder`
Open
Nobody has claimed this yet.
C-tracking-issue
S-tracking-unimplemented
T-libs
- Dominant language
- Rust
- Stars
- 119k
- Forks
- 16.1k
- PR merge metrics
- PR metrics pending
Description
Feature gate: #![feature(new_range_remainder)]
This is a tracking issue for the remainder method of new std::range iterator types.
Public API
// core::range
impl<A: Step> RangeFromIter<A> {
pub fn remainder(self) -> RangeFrom<A>;
}
impl<A: Step> RangeInclusiveIter<A> {
pub fn remainder(self) -> Option<RangeInclusive<A>>;
}
impl<A> RangeIter<A> {
pub fn remainder(self) -> Range<A>;
}
Steps / History
(Remember to update the S-tracking-* label when checking boxes.)
- Proposed with the
new_rangeRFC https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/3550 - Implementation: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/125751
- Final comment period (FCP)^1
- Stabilization PR
Unresolved Questions
- Making sure the exact behavior is reasonable
- Usecases needed https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/154443#issuecomment-4170798339
See Also
- Original tracking issue https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/125687
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start with the public API and the implementation PR #125751, then review the unresolved behavior links, including issues #154443 and #154443+. Done means resolving the behavior and use-case questions, completing the final comment period, and producing a stabilization PR.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- rust
- Domain
- compilers
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Quiet
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 25/100